CHICKS versus DUDES
Web page created 1 Mar 2016. Last update 21 September 2016.
This Web page includes the following nine sections:
INTRODUCTION – MANKIND’S BIGGEST CHALLENGE
Hi Folks! Welcome to THE MOST CRITICAL CHALLENGE facing mankind – “Chicks versus Dudes” (also known as “the elephant in the room”). Folks, if mankind does not wish to be self-terminating, we need to solve this problem! All other conspiracies combined are babyshit, compared to how females and males relate to each other. How females and males relate to each other AIN’T WORKIN’! Further, it is the dysfunctional nature of female/male relationships, that is the MOST (NEGATIVE) POWERFUL TOOL used to implement the rest of mankind’s conspiracies!
This author has some VERY HARSH WORDS on this page (Yeah, even more than the other pages!). This author does not believe in “candy-coating” a problem. This “Chicks versus Dudes” issue needs to be addressed head on, with the harshest of words.
A “proof” that all “governments” are, in fact “religions” (“Separation of church and state” is a smokescreen. More on “New Age” page.), are “laws” concerning, “Who are you allowed to fuck?” Do you really think that “fucking laws” aren’t related to “religion”?
An alternate title for this page, besides “Chicks versus Dudes”, could be, “Do You Want to Exist, or Not???”
This author does not expect to have chicks knocking on his door, looking for dates, especially if they read this page! That’s OK. This author has discovered the “power” of “legal porn”! Unlike chicks, “legal porn” shuts the fuck up when you click the “X”! This author has found “legal porn” to be the only defense against chicks, but a powerful, powerful defense against chicks.
- Sexual activity is a NECESSITY for physical, spiritual, and mental health of males! Sexual activity is better than prostate cancer! Any chicks who have a “problem” with this author’s ‘tude, need not apply to be this author’s squeeze!
- If a male experiences “erectile dysfunction” with a female sex partner, but does not experience “erectile dysfunction” soon afterwards with porn, then the “source” of the “erectile dysfunction” is not in the male – the “source” of the “erectile dysfunction” is with the female sex partner.
The claim that females are the “weaker sex”, is BULLSHIT! Males are physically stronger than females, but females are spiritually and mentally MUCH MORE POWERFUL than males.
- Don’t be fooled by movies and TV. Females run families, not males (ask any husband!).
- Females are more attractive than males (more hair on top of the head, less hair on the face).
- Females are vocally more powerful than males (Females are capable of screaming).
- Females have more physical control than males (Female handwriting is much neater than male handwriting.).
- Females are much smarter than males. If you want to know if someone is lying, who do you ask? A female or a male?
- Orthodox Jews have separate services for females and males, based on the premise, “any female can control any male”.
- When a dude in a bar wants to fight, it’s ALWAYS because the dude lost his squeeze. Dudes don’t fight when they lose jobs, but they fight when they lose their girlfriends. Males become much more emotionally attached than females, to female-male relationships. Dudes experience much more “heartbreak” than chicks.
The challenge of female-male relationships is addressed in the first “science fiction” book (many people question the “fiction”), written in 1871, “Vril, Power of the Coming Race” (available online). The race, called “Vril’ya”, was an underground, antediluvian (before the flood) race. In this book, Vril’ya females are not only mentally and spiritually stronger than males, females are also physically stronger and larger than males. In one of the “history” chapters, male Vril’ya had abandoned the females, because females had reached the point, at which they just killed males that the females didn’t like. In order for the males to return to the females, the females had to agree to “not kill” the males (Sounds reasonable to me! Vril’ya males must have “discovered” legal porn!).
This entire planet is extremely “man-hating”.
- Chicks have no respect for dudes. Chicks claim, “Dudes always think with their dicks.” While this claim is true, chicks “forget” to mention that “Chicks always think with their pussies”, and that chicks take unmerciful “advantage” of dudes with their sexual behavior.
- Chicks can claim, “Dudes don’t DESERVE respect!” While this claim is also true, a better path than self-termination, is a path that leads to respect for dudes. That’s where this Web page is heading. This author seeks to SOLVE the problem with chick/dude relationships, because this author actually LIKED having a squeeze!
And dudes, you need to change your attitudes too!!! You’re just as much as part of the problem as the chicks!!!
- The reason this page has a more “anti-female” tone than “anti-male” tone, is that it’s the chicks who have the “most control” over this problem.
- A profound CHANGE in “dude attitude” that will be discussed on this page, is that dudes need to develop a “Delilah Defense”. For greatest spiritual, mental, and physical health, dudes need to be ready and willing to RUN AWAY from any chick, as soon as the chick starts causing problems, regardless of how good-looking the chick is! “Heartbreak” is “more optimal” than “being thrown in jail” and/or “killed”!
The “institution” called “marriage” SUCKS! (Loved the “commercial” comment years ago, that marriage was a “great institution”, for those who love institutions.) Chicks love to have sex, but not with their husbands! Out of the thousands of marriages with which you are familiar, name ONE husband who gets a blowjob!
This author has been married twice, first marriage 14 years, second marriage 11 years, both ending in divorce. This author actually LIKED being married. Most men define “success” in a marriage by how long it lasts. This author defines “success” in a marriage by “whether or not he got out of it”! Thus, this author has had two “successful” marriages, first one for 14 years, second one for 11 years. Further, this author even describes both marriages as “happy” (Apparently, this author’s respective spouses were less “happy”.). When the marriages turned “bad”, this author terminated both marriages. This author found comfort in having a squeeze, but at what cost???
This author’s parents were married for over 50 years. They did not believe in “divorce”. Thus, the last 25 years of so-called “marriage”, was a constant battleground. The author’s mother was incapable of saying anything positive about the author’s father. The last 25 years were a far cry from the early days of their marriage, characterized by big smiles and loving embraces.
This author will not engage in a sexual relationship with an “underage” female, because this author dislikes the thought of spending the rest of his life in prison.
- This author does believe that the Universe “approves” of sexual relationships starting at puberty, and that, at age 13, males and females should be considered “adults”, and should be ALLOWED to enter into sexual relationships, including marriage.
- This author does NOT recommend that, at age 13, males and females SHOULD enter into sexual relationships. Sexual activity renders a profound change in a relationship, regardless of age. All males and females should be WARNED of these changes, and healthy discussion of sexual activity is encouraged. In other words, just because you “can”, doesn’t mean you “should”.
Do I have any readers left??? Did I have any readers in the first place???
………..end of “Introduction – Mankind’s Biggest Challenge”………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
MARRIAGE, DIVORCE, COHABITATION, AND ADULTERY
The biggest “problem” associated with the current implementation of “marriage”, is the involvement of “third parties”: lawyers, judges, religious officials, and churches.
- The Universe only recognizes “Free Will” agreements between two individuals. The Universe recognizes that Free Will agreements can be terminated at any time, for any reason, by either individual. Free Will agreements can be oral or written.
- The Universe recognizes Free Will male/female agreements to enter into a long term relationship. The Universe does not recognize written documents, signed by non-partners to an agreement (e.g. judges or religious officials), falsely “authorizing” a relationship; however, the Universe does recognize a partner’s Free Will intent to comply with the terms of the “non-binding” (to the Universe) agreement.
- The Universe recognizes the importance and impact of fucking. The Universe highly desires that fucking occur between consenting adults, with proper consideration of the consequences of the sexual relationship. The Universe DOES NOT CARE whether or not you have a piece of paper that “authorizes” the fucking!
- Jesus’ PROPER remark that “second marriage equals adultery” (Mark, Ch10, v11), was NOT an encouragement to “punish” remarried individuals as “adulterers” were punished; instead, Jesus’ remark was an indictment on the practice of “punishing” adulterers in the first place, and that remarried Pharisees were not “more honorable” because they had a piece of paper “authorizing” fucking of a new chick. Jesus reemphasized this position with his REFUSAL to punish the woman “caught in adultery” (John, Ch 8. NOTE: Chapter 8 of John was not written by John. The story of Jesus’ refusal to stone the woman “caught in adultery”, was a “known authentic” story, and the Nicene Council decided to “add the story” to John in the year 325AD. This author highly suspects that Chapter 8 of John was a record from Jesus’ trial before the Sanhedrin. This author also highly suspects that Chapter 8 of John took place at the same time that Jesus equated remarriage to adultery.).
The Universe recognizes the importance of long term male/female relationship called “marriage” for one purpose, and one purpose only: to raise children. If “raising children” is not included in a male/female relationship, “cohabitation” is the proper label, not “marriage”.
- “Cohabitation” differs from “marriage”, because of the profound responsibility of “raising children”.
- Unlike cohabitation, when “children” are included in a long term male/female relationship, the responsibilities of the male and female extend far beyond the individual male and female.
- The Universe considers “parenting” to be a SACRED responsibility, a responsibility not only to the children, but also to God. Adults who pose as “biological parents” to groom children for pedophile rings, are abominations, and will be cleansed.
Marriage “vows”, promising everlasting relationships through sickness and health, SUCK!.
- Jesus PROPERLY stated that “oaths come from evil” (Matthew, Ch5, v37). Marriage agreements should not include “promises” and “vows”.
- Marriage agreements, like any other Free Will agreements between two parties, should merely include statements of intent, and should also include provisions for “failure of consideration” and “termination” of marriage, guaranteed for either party, for any reason, at any time. “Unhappy marriage” is unhealthy, not only for marriage partners, but for children too. Why should a dude stay with a chick, who “turns on him”? Most importantly for this issue, “judges”, “lawyers”, “priests”, “ministers”, and “family counsellors” need to get their fucking noses out of the “running families” business (more accurately, “ruining families” business).
- “Financial advantages” of marriage, such as “tax breaks”, should be terminated. Couples should merely get the “financial advantages” of cohabitation, and nothing more.
How much should married couples fuck? (Dudes – couple times a day; Chicks – once a month). Or even non-married couples?
- Chicks control physical sexual activities. The old joke, “What’s the difference between a chick on a date and a dude on a date? Answer: The chick knows whether or not she’s gonna get laid.”
- It is proper that chicks control sexual activities, because chicks are “stuck” with the heaviest burden of sexual activities – pregnancy. It is not proper for chicks to lie and cheat, and to withhold sex from a husband, as a form of “punishment”.
- As mentioned near the beginning of this page, sexual activity is a necessity for male health. This author does not know how much of a necessity sexual activity is for female health, because the author has never found a female who speaks honestly about this issue. If a female spouse is “not in the mood”, “porn” has been proven (by the author) to be a reasonable alternative. Another alternative could be for the female spouse to “get in the mood”. If a wife does not care enough about her husband’s HEALTH, to ensure an outlet for sexual release, why even be married?
- Physical sexual activity should be part of a pre-marriage agreement, with the understanding that failure to meet this agreement is legitimate grounds for termination of the marriage.
- One thing’s for sure. Physical sexual activity is sure used by females to LURE males into marriage!
- This author has more questions than answers concerning sexual activity, especially fucking. If nothing more, this issue needs to be addressed as a “valid concern” for male/female couples interested in “long term” relationships.
Whether or not long-term female-male relationships are viable, is a question that needs to be addressed. This author has heard from one female and one male, “Monogamy is an unnatural state.” There is merit to this statement.
…………end of “Marriage, Divorce, Cohabitation, and Adultery”………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………
RAPE and ABUSE
This author is a strong believer that sexual activity should be allowed for consenting adults, with proper consideration for the consequences of the sexual activity. Male/Female sexual activity should only occur if both parties have “Free Will” agreed to the sexual activity.
This author is a strong believer that parents are ALWAYS responsible for their children.
This author is a strong believer that adults are ALWAYS responsible for situations in which they place themselves. “Consumption of alcohol” is NOT a “reasonable excuse” for “improper behavior” or “unintended consequences”.
- A story that dominated the “News” for weeks during the summer of 2016, was the story of a Stanford swimmer who was convicted of rape (Stanford swimmer claimed the sex was consensual.) for a chick who drank so much alcohol BEFORE (There’s a clue.) and during a fraternity party, that she “couldn’t remember” giving consent to sexual activity.
- On 9 June 2016, in a vile, disgusting “open letter”, Vice President Biden (who often makes young teenage females look very uncomfortable when he whispers in their ears) proclaimed this drunken chick to be “hero”, and Biden thanked this chick for her “bravery”!!! This author is not defending the actions of the male involved, but to proclaim this drunken chick a “hero” and thanking her for “bravery”????? Are you fucking kidding me?????
- How does anyone know that the “victim” chick’s sex was “without consent”, if the chick doesn’t even “remember”??? How is it even possible for a chick to “not remember” whether or not she said “yes”??? “Doesn’t remember” DOES NOT EQUAL “No”. How can this “rape” meet the requisite “beyond a reasonable doubt”???
- And why did such a flaky case (Two “rescuers” were students from Sweden. hmmmmmmm. How unusual.) spark SO MUCH national “outrage” (thousands of petition signatures and a Vice Presidential letter), while thousands and thousands of other, much more serious cases, involving very young children who did not drink any alcohol, are swept under the rug????? Folks, this Stanford “rape” case was a total Intelligence operation. This author is not encouraging sympathy for the male convicted of rape, but this author is encouraging NON-SYMPATHY for everyone else involved, including the “rescuers”.
This author knows many males who were HELD ACCOUNTABLE for circumstances that occurred when the males drank too much alcohol. Since when are females IMMUNE FROM ACCOUNTABILITY due to excess alcohol consumption???
While this author disapproves of “non-consensual” sexual activity, this author questions the “minimum punishments” and the “requisite evidence” required for “rape” convictions.
This author does not vote (will not support the Nazi illusion of “choice”), and has little interest in the “puppet” selected to “lead”. But during the Presidential campaign in April, 2016, a very interesting question and answer, highlighted this profound female/male relationship problem.
- Question. Kasich was asked by a female, what he would do as President, to make the female “feel” better about issues such as “sexual harassment” and “rape”. The fact that this question WAS EVEN ASKED, is an indication of a “problem”. Since when is a President more responsible for the “feelings” of a female, than the female???
- Answer. This author is not a fan of Kasich, but Kasich’s response was VERY REASONABLE! Kasich said, “Don’t go to parties where there’s lots of alcohol.” A better response would have been for Kasich to ask the female questioner, “What do you think a President should do to make you feel safe, and do you think that you have any responsibility towards your own feelings of safety, in the question you have imposed on me?”
- This author has heard multiple arguments, via Nazi-controlled media, that females are not responsible for the situations in which they place themselves, and that females can say “no” to sex at any time. This author strongly agrees that females can say “no” to sex at any time. This author strongly disagrees that females are not responsible for the situations in which they place themselves.
- Further, this author finds it difficult to believe that vaginal “sexual violation” could be any worse than the three times that this author, strapped down and immobilized, had a catheter illegally stuck in his penis, by females who were “paid” to perform these abominable acts (Southwest General Hospital, Rittman Hospital, and Parma Hospital). The catheter insertions were extremely painful. Are any females “outraged” by the painful penis treatment performed upon this author???
Females who consume alcohol then “Free Will” visit a male’s hotel room, should not be treated with the same “sympathy” as a female who is ambushed by a group of males who jump out from behind some bushes. To apply the same “sentencing” standards to these diverse situations is outrageous. If a female is physically attacked/battered prior to sexual activity, it is reasonable to add “assault” to the charges. Once again, this author supports a female’s right to say “no” to sex at any time; however, a female’s Free Will decisions to enter into a compromising situation, should also be considered as a “mitigating factor”.
Physical abuse. This author has maintained for decades that, in a residence in which physical abuse is occurring, there are AT LEAST TWO assholes living there.
- This author maintains that there is no valid reason to EVER have to call cops to a home a SECOND time. If either partner in a relationship ever thinks that cops are required to “solve” relationship problems, it’s time to end the relationship.
- For optimal health, dudes need to be willing to RUN AWAY from chicks who start to demonstrate aggressive physical tendencies. When this author observed a spouse starting to “knock things around”, this author hightailed it out of the house, and would not come back until the spouse guaranteed that these tendencies would not recur. Further, if the tendencies did recur, this author was ready to hightail it out of the house again, on foot if necessary. If cops show up to a house with dude/chick problems, the dude’s goin’ to jail. It makes no difference which of the two is the aggressor.
…………end of “Rape and Abuse”………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………
MAGNETISM – THE CHALLENGE TO MONOGAMY
Good news and bad news!
First the “good news”. The fundamental element underlying the “souring” of ALL female/male relationships, has a very, very simple explanation!
Now the “bad news”. The very, very simple explanation, is that we’re fighting the POWER OF THE UNIVERSE!
The underlying “cause” that female/male relationships go bad, is that “magnets assimilate”! It’s that simple! Here’s how it works.
Everything in the Universe (more correctly “Duoverse”) is magnetic. Everything is a composition of what man calls “protons” (positive), “electrons” (negative), and “neutrons” (neutral).
“Electromagnetism” is THE ONLY FORCE at work in the Universe.
- “Electricity” is the force as the force moves through matter (solid or liquid).
- “Magnetism” is the force as the force moves through non-matter Ether (You don’t even need “air”.).
- “Electricity” and “Magnetism” ALWAYS WORK TOGETHER. Where you find one force, you ALWAYS find the other force. Spin a magnet within wire, you get electricity. Run a current through wire surrounding an iron rock, you get magnetism.
- The Earth, like ALL celestial bodies, is a great big magnet. Earth has a “North Pole” and a “South Pole”. The “voltage” of Earth is low, just enough to align a small piece of metal called a “compass pointer”, but the “amperage” of Earth is virtually infinite, from man’s point of view.
- Men are also magnets. “EKG” results show electricity running through our bodies. “Emotions”, which affect electricty within a man’s body, are also manifest in magnetic pulses which resonate from a man’s body.
The “force” that so-called “scientists” call “gravity” is a total farce! Of all the retarded claims made by “scientists”, the claim that “gravity” is a separate force from “electromagnetism”, is the most retardedest!!!
- The slightest bit of common sense, makes it EXTREMELY OBVIOUS that “gravity” is a subset of “magnetism”.
- Items always fall “down”, because man lives within a very small confinement WITHIN the magnetic field of the Earth.
- If you hold your keys above your head and drop them, the keys will fall “down” to the ground. But if you take your keys 100 miles “up” and drop them, the keys go into orbit. Where’s your “gravity” 100 miles “up”?
- The magnetic field of the Earth extends to the top of the ionisphere, usually about 40 miles above ground. While 40 miles sound like “a lot” to man, 40 miles is small, compared to the 8,000-mile virtual diameter of the Earth (00.5%).
- In other words, all objects, including man, are “very small magnets” living “WITHIN the magnetic field” of a very large magnet. It’s that simple! There’s your so-called “gravity”.
The “Gravity Model” works very well within the VERY LIMITED CONFINES of man’s existence (Throwing a rock, hitting a baseball, driving up a hill, etc.). To apply the “Gravity Model” to forces outside of Earth’s atmosphere, is about as retarded as you can get! “Scientists” have NO MATHMATICAL MODEL that explains “orbits”, which occur EVERYWHERE outside of Earth’s atmosphere! When “scientists” explain comets missing the sun through “gravity and other forces”, a more accurate spin than “gravity and other forces”, is “NOT gravity”.
Back to the subject. How does “magnetism” relate to “monogamy challenge”?
Answer. Magnets in the same area ALWAYS ASSIMILATE with each other!!! The magnets adopt each other’s magnetic characteristics! Always! Females who live together gain identically timed menstruation cycles. Touch two “magnets” together, and they stick together to form one (If the magnets repel, they’re not in the same area.).
The “excitement” felt when a male first meets a female, is the emotional manifestation, of the fact that their physical bodies (magnets) have not assimilated. As the male and female spend more time together, the magnetic fields of their physical bodies assimilate, and the excitement decreases. Name ONE COUPLE who you have ever observed holding hands, touching each other continuously, and enjoying each other’s company, who feel the same way about each other, two years later! It doesn’t happen!
Is there anything a male and female can do, to maintain “excitement” and “love”, after first meeting?
Answer: I don’t know! The most fundamental part of an answer, is that couples who “spend all of their time together”, are challenging the Universe! Here are a couple of “theories”:
- All men, male and female, should ensure that they schedule “alone” time for personal pursuits and/or meditation. “Personal time” may be at the “bottom” of a man’s priority list, but it should also be important enough to ensure that “personal time is accommodated”.
- For a marriage, this author theorizes that living quarters may be most optimal with at least separate rooms, maybe even separate houses close to each other. Separate houses would allow partners to have meals together and enjoy each other’s company, but still allow “total escape” for personal pursuits. Further, separate houses would “solve” the need for “division of property” if the couple chooses to divorce.
- When dudes and chicks first encounter each other, they are often at work, or after work, or at some type of social function, in which they are at the “top of their game”: looking as good as they can, behaving as “flirty” as they can. Conversely, husbands and wives normally spend the largest portion of their lives together, at the “bottom of their game”. Couples who are “madly in love” after a couple of months of dating, should ponder the question, “Will you feel the same after waking up next to each other for 10 years in a row, with bad breath?” If nothing else, separate residences would allow couples to have the opportunity to be at the “bottom of their game” while they’re alone.
A very common female theme, is that a male “doesn’t make her feel special”. Once a female “doesn’t feel special”, the female/male assimilation is complete, and currently, there are no workable “solutions” to the “doesn’t-feel-special” problem.
- This author does not merely “point fingers at females”, because all female/male relationships are also the responsibility of the male. The purpose of this paragraph, is twofold.
- First, this author argues to females, that the “doesn’t-feel-special” problem is not ONLY “male”.
- Secondly, this author argues to males, that males need to understand the REAL cause of the “problem”, so that males might possibly, for the first time in history, find a “solution”.
- For instance, “spending more time together” DOES NOT SOLVE a problem, caused by “spending too much time together”. A possible direction for “doesn’t-feel-special” problem, is to “spend less time together”, and for females to “accept responsibility” for their own feelings, particularly in the form of interests and passions that do NOT involve the male (e.g. exercise, music, hobbies, etc.).
This author has observed a number of chicks who greatly desire and gain, independence from the dudes in their relationship. In well over half of these separations, the chicks seem to be “less pleased” with the dude’s independence from the chick!
- When either partner in a dude/chick relationship calls it quits, both parties should LEAVE EACH OTHER ALONE.
- Both parties should throw away photographs, letters, and other memorabilia that relate to the departed partner. “Living in the past” is spiritually harmful. Only time can heal the spiritual wounds of heartbreak.
- Memories cannot be avoided, but memories can be diminished by NOT ADDING to the problem.
One of the biggest “heartbreak factors” is a total misunderstanding of “costs”, especially “sunken costs”.
- This author has heard many stories of “lost investment” from broken relationships. A relationship is NOT an “investment”. A relationship is a “COST“.
- “Costs” in the past are called “sunken costs”, and they’re already spent! Sunken costs should NOT BE CONSIDERED when making decisions concerning the future.
- “Sunken costs” should not be confused with the word “wasted”! Both parties “received value” from the relationship, while the relationship took place. If you didn’t receive “value”, that’s on YOU! “Sunken costs” DOES NOT EQUAL “wasted time”. “Sunken costs” merely mean that the Karma has already been spent (Just as “rent” was spent in consideration for a place to live).
…………end of “Magnetism – The Challenge to Monogamy”………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………
MARRIAGE IS NOT 50/50!
Marriage is NOT 50/50!!! Marriage is 100/100!!!
“But Rock, that adds up to 200%, you retard! You’re just overstating your case!”
Answer: No!!! I am not overstating the case! Marriage is 100/100. Each partner is only HALF of the marriage. The 200% total that you see, is remedied by a factor called “negative common costs”. The 100/100 is the TRUE MATH of a marriage.
This author had extensive training, during his three years as a “Cost Analyst” (job ended in 1992) for Ohio Bell. During this training, the author encountered a VALID MATHMATICAL model, that supports the 100/100 claim. The model was called “Cows and the Corn”.
- In this model, a standard training model for cost analysts, the class was challenged to present ACCURATE COSTS for the following “business opportunity” (just as “marriage” is a “business opportunity”):
- You own an island, and you have three options.
- First option. You could raise cows.
- Second option. You could grow corn.
- Third option. You could raise cows AND grow corn, but you would need to construct a $100 fence to keep the cows out of the corn.
- Question: How do you allocate the $100 required for the fence, when evaluating your business options?
- In response to the question about the $100 for the fence, the entire class, including the author, answered, “$50 to the cows and $50 to the corn”.
- But the instructor then pointed out to the class, that assigning $50 each to the cows and corn, created an INVALID MATHMATICAL MODEL. If we ran our model for “cows only” or “corn only”, the model would add $50 for a fence THAT WAS NOT REQUIRED.
- For the model to accurately reflect the cost of the fence, the entire $100 for the fence was assigned to the cows, the entire $100 for the fence was assigned to the corn, and then a NEGATIVE $100 was assigned to a category called “common costs”. “Common costs” are normally positive, because either option requires the costs. In the “cows and corn” model, the common costs were NEGATIVE, because BOTH options were required to incur the cost.
- Thus, if the class ran “cows only”, there was $100 for the fence minus the $100 common cost – total $0. Same results for “corn only”. And if the class ran “cows and corn”, there was $100 for the fence from the cows, $100 for the fence from the corn, MINUS $100 common cost – total $100. Unlike the 50/50 model, the 100/100 accurately reflected the TRUE costs.
The “negative common costs” that were REQUIRED to accurately reflect costs for “cows versus corn”, are also REQUIRED to accurately reflect “costs” of a marriage (business) opportunity.
Marriage is not an “EITHER/OR” agreement. Marriage is an “AND” agreement. BOTH partners must be committed to marriage. For a healthy marriage, both husband and wife need to be %100 committed to the marriage. 50/50 may work, but 100/100 is the more optimal choice. The 100/100 adds up to 200, but BOTH partners receive “benefits” by virtue of cohabitating and living in partnership. The benefits are reflected in -100% common costs.
The most important advice that this author provides for any couple considering marriage, is, “Marriage DOES NOT solve any problems! Nothing puts more strain on a relationship than marriage! If you have an extremely strong relationship, MAYBE it will survive a marriage.”
In other words, forget everything you’ve ever been told about “living happily ever after”. KNOW AND BE PREPARED for the challenges that marriage presents. Especially be prepared for the biggest challenge to marraige, mentioned in the previous section, the “loss of excitement”. This author was impressed with a “child raising” technique told by a former Christian Educator. She would tell her two children, “Let’s pretend that we’re nice to each other.” Maybe “pretending” to be excited about a long marriage, is a partial first step.
Nevertheless, this author does not deny that he ENJOYED being married. Both times! Can it happen again??? Is there any chick who would put up the author’s crazy ideas??? Haven’t found one yet.
…………end of “Marriage is NOT 50/50!”………….
……………………………………………………………………………………………
PEDOPHILE RINGS – THE ABOMINATION OF CHOICE
Planet Earth is currently Karma-controlled by secret societies and Intelligence agencies, which gain most of their “power” (more accurately, “negative power”) through pedophile rings.
- Although pedophile rings have been “primary control tools” since the beginning of man’s existence, the use of pedophile rings to control mankind, increased significantly after World War II. “Operation Paperclip”, the import of Nazi “scientists” to the US after World War II, introduced the US to “MK-ULTRA”, the abomination program used to sexually control children, developed by Nazi Intelligence, and absorbed into the CIA’s “arsenal of abominations”.
- Check YouTube for hundreds of documented cases of child kidnapping, torture, sex training, and sacrifice, involving CIA, Freemasons, top government officials, and “media stars”.
- These abominations are VERY WELL KNOWN at the highest levels of government, by top media executives, and by so-called “law enforcement agencies”. Pedophile rings are NOT REPORTED by mainstrean media and are NOT PROSECUTED by “law enforcement agencies” (mainly the FBI), because mainstream media and law enforcement agencies are WILLING PARTICIPANTS in these pedophile abominations. Billions of dollars are spent to arrange, support, and control the sexual gratification of so-called “world leaders”.
- For a disgusting, but necessary description of how young girls are mind-controlled, search YouTube for “15 Years Old Girl Survive Illuminati Satanic Rituals Abuse Pt 1”. Other horrifying stories can be found on YouTube by searching “Monarch Mind Control”. The “Monarch” stories are particularly related to the Nazi “doctors and scientists” who took over the US after WWII, when the Nazi SS became the CIA. The “Monarch” videos claim that doctors work with Freemasons (especially 32nd degree and above) to “harvest” children for these abominations, shielding the CIA from direct involvement with the “harvest” phase.
- With the most unusual timing, copies of police reports concerning the 2003 raid on late entertainer Michael Jackson’s “Neverland Ranch”, were released on 22 June 2016. The Santa Barbara Police ADMITTED that the reports were AUTHENTIC, but that the reports were released through “improper channels”!!! “Improper channels” means that the Santa Barbara Police WEREN’T ABOUT TO RELEASE THESE REPORTS TO ANYONE!!! This story, one of the most important stories to ever make the “News”, first reported by the Web site RadarOnline, disappeared from all major “News” Web sites in less than 24 hours! This story is not just a story of a dead singer. This story is about the pedophilia control of the entertainment industry, pedophilia control that STILL EXISTS TODAY, and it is the story of police and judicial coverup of pedophilia, that STILL EXISTS TODAY!
- The police reports included pornography descriptions of children being tortured, nude children in perverse sexual positions with adults, animal sacrifice and torture, children holding dead dismembered animals, and sadomasochism.
- Santa Barbara Police responded that they complied with “discovery” requirements of Jackson’s 2003 child molestation trial. In other words, since these horrifying pictures weren’t directly related to the two children accusing Michael Jackson of molestation, the jury that acquitted Michael Jackson DID NOT SEE THIS EVIDENCE!!!
- The JUDGE and POLICE conspired to SHIELD pedophilia monster Michael Jackson from prosecution, by CHOOSING to NOT REVEAL the results of the raid on Neverland.
- Now that these horrifying stories are FINALLY being revealed, cleansing of the Earth can be accelerated. CIA and Freemasons (along with judges and law enforcement agencies that shield pedophilia) WILL BE CLEANSED!!!
This author has reached the discouraging conclusion, that every single “media star”, musician, politician, business “leader”, billionaire, male or female, had to have been raised in a pedophile ring.
- The media are not about to broadcast (i.e. ask for Karma) a man who would “blow the cover” off of pedophile rings.
- The “fact” that the media draw attention to a man, is de facto “proof” that the man can be controlled.
- The most effective “one-on-one” mind control tool is sexual activity.
- Very rich men will pay lots of money for sexual activity with athletes and musicians. The US gymnastics organization has been publicly accused of illegal sexual conduct.
- Even musicians must prove their “controlability”, prior to be given access to secret musical Knowledge and promotion of musical performances. For a variety of stories involving music and pedophile rings, search the Internet: “CIA and Laurel Canyon” (“Laurel Canyon” was the birthplace for many rock bands in the late 1960’s, the site of the Manson murders, and home to a secretive Disney recording studio.).
Pedophile rings are controlled by females, not males. It is “mothers” who enroll their daughters in child “beauty pageants”, not fathers.
- In exchange for selling young daughters for sex, the families are “rewarded” (more accurately, “trapped”) with untold riches, access to Knowledge, and special privileges.
- Young daughters do not complain. Young daughters are threatened with serious harm, but more importantly, young daughters feel empowered by being in on “secrets”, and by being able to control much older men, men with access to incredible wealth.
- Many so-called “families” are not “biological families” at all, but are intelligence pods, with trained handlers posing as “biological mother” and “biological father”, unknown to the child being groomed for pedophilia. Doctors and hospitals are steeped in pedophile activities, rendering easy falsification of birth records. “Parent” handlers are trained in Satantic mind-control activities, such as shutting young children in dark enclosures with spiders and snakes, and forcing young children to view sacrifices OF MEN!!! These false “parent” handlers have no regard for their “children”, knowing that the job of the “parent” handlers, is to groom these children for “riches” and (negative) “power”.
A Biblical example of female pedophile control is Herodias, who had her daughter (Salome, according to Josephus) dance and command the head of John the Baptist (Matthew Ch 14, v 6, Mark Ch 6, v 22).
A second Biblical example of female pedophile control is the story of Lot in Sodom and Gomorrah. Ancient Sumerian clay tablets, which correspond to the Biblical account, also tell the story of Sodom and Gommorah’s destruction. Lot was a spy in Sodom and Gommorah. Lot’s offering of his young daughters (Genesis, Ch 18, v 8) to a group of males, in a city filled with depravity, makes it obvious that Lot’s daughters were being raised as child hookers. The Bible claims that the removal of Lot from Sodom and Gommorah was an act of mercy by the “LORD God” (Genesis, Ch 19, v 16, “LORD God” corresponds to Sumerian “Marduk”.). The REAL reason that the “Angels” (Watchers) removed Lot from Sodom and Gommorah, was that “LORD God” did not have authority to kill Lot. Lot had to be removed BEFORE “LORD God” could destroy Sodom and Gommorah, using some type of ancient “nuclear” device (According to Sumerian tablets, the resulting radiation cloud also wiped out Sumer, called “Shinar” in the Bible.). The “control” of pedophilia by Lot’s wife (unnamed in the Bible) is obvious, because Lot’s wife did not have authority to survive the attack on Sodom and Gommorah. Lot’s wife was not turned into a “pillar of salt” as the Bible claims (Genesis, Ch 19, v 26); instead, Lot’s wife was turned into a “cloud” – she was vaporized.
The Bible very consistently holds males accountable for misdeeds, while holding females blameless. This author absolutely agrees that males should be held totally accountable for misdeeds. This author disagrees that females should be held blameless. Abraham’s (originally “Abram”) wife/sister Sarah (originally “Sarai”) is not held accountable for Abraham pimping her out to the Egyptian Pharaoh (Genesis, Ch 12, v 18) or to King Abimelek (Genesis, Ch 20, v 1). Both pimping episodes resulted in Abraham and Sarah receiving large payouts. This author highly suspects that Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac (See “New Age” page.) was at the command of Sarah. Sarah must have looked pretty good at 90 years old, for a king to have wanted her.
The largest part of the “solution” for pedophilia, is the Universe requirement that at puberty (age 13), a man (male or female) becomes an “adult”. The self-terminating concepts called “teenager” and “minor” will be eliminated. There will be challenges for the transition to 13-year-old “adult”, but these challenges will be far less harmful, than what we’re doing to ourselves today.
There are THREE PEDOPHILIA ELEPHANTS IN THE ROOM for all of the numerous reports of pedophilia. All so-called “News” reports of pedophilia mention only the adult “criminal” and the child “victim”.
- FIRST PEDOPHILIA “ELEPHANT”. “News” reports of pedophila never mention the child “victim’s” PARENTS! This author cannot read a story about pedophilia, without asking himself the question, “Where were the child’s parents???” This author is a believer that a responsibility of parents is to PROTECT their children. Should parents be charged with “child abuse” for leaving a child with an untrustworthy adult??? Parents are charged with “child abuse” for other irresponsible acts.
- SECOND PEDOPHILIA “ELEPHANT”. “News” reports never mention the second “elephant in the room”: the WILLINGNESS of the child “victim”. Some child “victims” are RAISED by their parents to participate in pedophile activities, with CIA-sponsored sex training starting at age two. Many of these child “victims” DESIRE to be sexually abused by adults, in exchange for “power” (more correctly, “illusion of power”) and money. This author does not support pedophilia “criminalization” of the child (although children are “punished” for other delinquent behavior); however, this author does recommend that other adults BEWARE of possible child sexual aggressors. Prevention of inappropriate adult/child relationships is not only to protect the child, prevention is also recommended to protect the adult.
- THIRD PEDOPHILIA “ELEPHANT”. The third “elephant in the room”, also never mentioned by the “News”, is the history of PREVIOUS SEXUAL ACTIVITY by the child “victim”.
- There are reports of “parents” who solicit their children for sex! Parents of child “victims”, should ALWAYS be asked to explain the circumstances, that led to their UNSUCCESSFUL “PROTECTION” of their child!
- If a teenage female fucks 100 same-age males, this sexual activity is “slap-on-the-wrist” realm. But as soon as the same teenage female fucks her 101st male, an 18-year-old, it’s the crime of the century. If they’re old enough to speak in court or to a so-called “law enforcement” officer, even young children should be questioned about OTHER sexual activity in which they have engaged.
- The only way to truly “protect” a child, is to seek the Truth and solve the problem!
The “News” describes this author’s three “elephants in the room” as “attacking the victim”, to which this author replies, “Absolutely!!!” Folks, individuals who take action to DESTROY the life of another man, SHOULD be attacked!!! Do not underestimate the harm imparted to a man, by a conviction of a sexual offense and by decades of incarceration! Before extending “sympathy” to a “victim” by destroying the life of a man, a judge or jury should first ENSURE that the defendant deserves to have his life destroyed!
…………end of “Pedophile Rings – the Abomination of Choice”…………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
MALES, NOT FEMALES, SHOULD CARE FOR CHILDREN
………………………..in progress………………………..
…………end of “Males, not Females, Should Care for Children”…………
……………………………………………………………………………………………
“PERFECT MATH”: THE “CAUSE” OF “CHICKS versus DUDES”
………………………..in progress………………………..
…………end of “‘Perfect Math’: the ‘Cause’ of ‘Chicks versus Dudes'”………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………
“CHICKS versus DUDES” SOLUTIONS
………………………..in progress………………………..
…………end of “‘Chicks versus Dudes’ Solutions”………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………
All information on Free Fiddle Workshop is COPYLEFT, not copyright. Spread the real news. The author (real name Roger Reynard) claims NO OWNERSHIP of this material.